| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fix: ipv6-dns accel-ppp.conf.5
|
|
Fix typos accel-ppp.conf.5
|
|
shaper: fix fq_codel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
original commit author is @dyangol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 6f433706a152ea987899fd830ff399e257b0f2a6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sstp: fix proxy-protocol-v2 sanity checks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rework the conditionals to make __ipoe_session_activate() and
ipoe_session_finished() follow the same logic:
* Drop the second '!serv->opt_ifcfg' test in __ipoe_session_activate(),
which is is already checked by the parent conditional.
* Invert the order of the tests in ipoe_session_finished(), so that
it uses the same conditions as __ipoe_session_activate().
Finally, set the 'src' parameter in iproute_del(), so that we can be
sure that the deleted route matches the one added by
__ipoe_session_activate().
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Using NLM_F_ACK in these functions is confusing because they don't
parse any netlink response.
In fact, NLM_F_ACK is only required internally by rtnl_talk(), which
already adds it when its 'answer' parameter is NULL. Therefore it's
useless to manually set it in functions that don't set 'answer'.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
These are deletion requests. NLM_F_CREATE is confusing for readers and
ignored by kernel.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
No need to be clever here. All IPv6 routes have global scope (kernel
ignores rtm_scope for IPv6 and always reports RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE when
dumping such routes).
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
From a logical point of view, we have link scope if no gateway is
present, and global scope otherwise. Therefore it makes more sense
to set rtm_scope depending on 'gw' rather than on 'ifindex'.
Currently, callers of iproute_add() and iproute_del() either set
'ifindex' or 'gw', but never both. So even if confusing, the current
code results in right scope selection. However one can't figure this
out without analysing every caller.
We should set rtm_scope based on the presence of the gateway instead.
Given the current code base, that doesn't change the end result, but
that better maches the scope concept. Also, that's the way iproute2
does its selection.
Furthermore, it'd be perfectly valid to have both 'iface' and 'gw' set.
In that case, scope should be RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE instead of
RT_SCOPE_LINK. Basing scope selection on 'gw' makes this case work
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Be more specific about which route we want to remove. By not specifying
the gateway we could remove a different route than the one we
originally inserted.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Rework iproute_del() to have the same parameters as iproute_add().
This will allow callers to specify more precisely the route they want
to delete.
Callers will later be converted to make use of these parameters to
ensure that the removed route precisely matches the one that was
originaly inserted.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Now that we have primitives for parsing IPv4 ranges, let's use them to
simplify parse_iprange().
Try u_parse_ip4cidr() first. In case of failure, try u_parse_ip4range().
If any of them succeeds, verify that there aren't spurious data
following the range definition. If everything is valid, either load the
range or disable the module (if the range is 0.0.0.0/0).
The diff is a bit ugly, but the implementation should be much clearer.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Define the IPv4 counterparts of u_ip6str() and u_parse_ip6cidr().
Also add the special u_parse_ip4range() which will be useful for
parsing the [client-ip-range] section of accel-ppp.conf.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Redefine u_parse_ip4addr() to match the behaviour of other u_parse_*()
functions:
* Drop the err_msg parameter.
* Return the number of bytes parsed instead of an error number.
* Remove support for fancy IPv4 address notations.
There is currently only one user of u_parse_ip4addr() (in iprange.c).
Dropping the fancy IPv4 address representations is probably not going
to harm anyone (quite the opposite as many users don't realise that
leading 0 means octal and that plain integers can be considered IPv4
addresses).
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
u_parse_endstr() used to be u_parse_eos() in my internal repository.
I forgot to update the documentation when I renamed it.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Framed-IPv6-Route is the IPv6 counterpart of Framed-Route. It's only
used for defining routes to be added locally by accel-ppp. Routes that
should be announced to the peer using Router Advertisements should be
defined in the Route-IPv6-Information attribute (but that's currently
not implemented).
Framed-IPv6-Route format is:
<network in CIDR notation> [<gateway IPv6 address> [<route metric>]]
The gateway address and the route metric are optionals, but the metric
can only be set if a gateway address is given. One can use the
unspecified address '::' to define a route with no gateway and a
non-default route metric.
When no gateway address is defined, the session's network interface is
used directly.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Define parsers for IPv6 addresses and CIDR notations, unsigned
integers, separators (variable number of space characters) and end of
strings (variable number of spaces followed by '\0').
All of these functions work on constant string and return the number
bytes parsed. If the input string doesn't have the expected format,
these functions return 0 (no forward progress).
Also implement a convenient wrapper around inet_ntop() that can be used
easily in printf-like functions.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
Let callers set a gateway and a priority to IPv6 routes. This is
necessary for implementing the RADIUS Framed-IPv6-Route attribute.
Also let ip6route_del() configure .rtm_protocol. This is already
implemented in ip6route_add(), so we need to add the ip6route_del()
counterpart. Otherwise, we couldn't delete routes that were added using
a non-zero protocol.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
In DSL setups, it's common to have an intermediate equipment,
potentially managed by a different operator, between the two PPP
endpoints. In such setups, the client establishes a PPPoE or L2TP
session with the intermediate equipment. They perform LCP negotiation
and eventually get to the authentication phase. Based on the client's
username, the intermediate equipment then establishes another L2TP
session with the final PPP endpoint (accel-ppp). At this point, the
intermediate equipment forwards any PPP frame received on one side to
the other side, so that it becomes transparent to PPP frames.
Then accel-ppp starts an LCP negotiation again, performs
authentication, negotiates NCPs and finally forwards IP packets to and
from the client.
+--------+ +--------------+ +-----------+
| Client |------------------------| Intermediate |--------------------| accel-ppp |
| | | equipment | | |
+--------+ +--------------+ +-----------+
<-- First hop PPPoE --> <-- Second hop -->
or L2TP session L2TP session
<----------------- End to end PPP session ----------------->
Therefore, from the client point of view, two LCP negotiations occur.
LCP re-negotiation is explicitly handled by RFC 1661 and even
non-conforming PPP clients generally cope with this situation well
enough (as long as LCP re-negotiation occurs before the authentication
phase completes).
However, accel-ppp always starts its LCP negotiation with an identifier
set to 1. If the previous LCP negotiation also used identifier 1, then
some clients (at least MikroTik products) consider that the
Configure-Request sent by accel-ppp is part of the previous LCP
negotiation and refuse to return to link establishment phase as
mandated by section 3.4 of RFC 1661.
We can easily work around this problem by using random identifiers.
This maximises the chances that accel-ppp picks a different identifier
than the intermediate equipment and avoids falling into the MikroTik
problem. In case of bad luck and the chosen identifier is the same as
the one used for the original LCP negotiation, then PPP establishment
fails and the client tries to reconnect until the intermediate
equipment and accel-ppp pick up different numbers. So the connection
eventually succeeds.
The identifier is set in ppp_fsm_init(), so it also affects NCPs.
Therefore, IPCP and IPv6CP now also use random identifiers.
We need to define 'id' and 'recv_id' in struct ppp_fsm_t as uint8_t,
otherwise they could be chosen larger than 255 and comparing their
value with the 8-bits values found in received packets would fail (this
was generally not a problem when id was initially set to 1 and wouldn't
grow much).
Also, let's seed random() at startup, so that we don't end up with the
same sequences across restarts. This also benefits other users of
random(), like LCP magic numbers.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
This callback isn't used anymore. Let's remove it from all
authentication backends.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
If we receive a Configure-Request packet, that means the peer wants us
to authenticate to him. However, none of our authentication backends
(PAP, CHAP and MSCHAP v1/v2) supports authenticating ourself to the
peer. Therefore, the LCP negotiation completes, but we hang in the
authentication phase because accel-ppp never sends any credential.
We should reject the Authentication-Protocol option found in
Configure-Request packets sent by the peer. This way, the peer knows
that we won't authenticate to him. Then it's up to him to keep
connecting without authentication from our side or to drop the
connection.
This doesn't change the way we request the peer to authenticate to us.
That part of the negotiation is handled by Configure-Request packets
that are sent by us (not those sent by the peer).
In practice some PPP clients wouldn't connect with the previous
behaviour, but are perfectly happy with their Authentication-Protocol
option being rejected. They just resend their Configure-Request without
requesting authentication from our side.
Also, since the peer_auth field of struct auth_option_t is never set
anymore, we can remove the conditionals in auth_recv_conf_nak() and
auth_recv_conf_rej().
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
|
The openssl/ssl.h header file is already included at the beginning of
this file.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
|
