| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Bind sshd to given VRF and check if it really runs in the VRF context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bgp: T2850: Fix FRR template for new bgp scheme
|
|
|
|
T3029 Correct generated nginx content
|
|
The redirection was using the wrong variable ($server_name),
making the browser going to https://_ instead of the right
variable.
|
|
|
|
Renamed using snippet below:
----------------------------
for file in $(find . -name "*.py")
do
sed -i "s/vyos_dict_search/dict_search/" $file
done
|
|
|
|
There is a Myricom 10G card with 16k MTU available.
|
|
smoketest: T3003: extend framework to load arbitrary config file
|
|
bgp: T2387: Fix XML sheme for new bgp and bgp.py handler
|
|
accel: T2631: Add option for radius disable-accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 9939139ba4ad18dc4b62a827d8ab7b74d0c28124.
Unfortunately this test does not work within the CI system. It fails with:
17:21:35 ======================================================================
17:21:35 FAIL: test_process_named_running (test_util.TestVyOSUtil)
17:21:35 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
17:21:35 Traceback (most recent call last):
17:21:35 File "/var/lib/jenkins/jenkins_slave/workspace/vyos-1x_current/build/src/tests/test_util.py", line 34, in test_process_named_running
17:21:35 self.assertTrue(isinstance(pid, int))
17:21:35 AssertionError: False is not true
As process_named_running() returns None on non existing bash process
|
|
The CLI node was read in incorrect (wrong path). In addtition the list was not
reset to [] when authentication was specified on the CLI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Error while copying statement from preference node.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current wversion unfortunately will raise a KeyError:
>>> data = {}
>>> vyos_dict_search('foo', data)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/vyos/util.py", line 685, in vyos_dict_search
return dict[path]
KeyError: 'foo'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of VyOS code requires the Kernel interface to be present in order to
properly work and adjust the interface to the users CLI intends (alias, ipv6,
vrf - just to name a few).
OpenVPN - when run in client mode - only creates the interface (e.g. vtun1) when
the connection to the OpenVPN server was successful. This can't be always the
case due to e.g. software-updates or routing issues to the remote side. This
will in the end result in a zombie OpenVPN client interface where some config
items might not have been set when the interface finally comes up - imagine a
wrong assigned VRF instance.
By always creating the OpenVPN interface manuall we ensure that all the CLI
settings are properly configured in the OS kernel.
|
|
op-mode: lldp: T2993: Fixup 'show lldp neighbors'
|
|
Check that interfaces have been returned from lldpcli to prevent trace when
no interfaces are enabled for lldp.
|
|
op-mode: lldp: T2993: Fix 'show lldp neighbors'
|
|
'show lldp neighbors' fails with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./lldp_op.py", line 122, in <module>
config_text = tmpl.render(parse_data(neighbors))
File "./lldp_op.py", line 51, in parse_data
for local_if, values in tmp.items():
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'items'
`parse_data` was expecting data to be provided as a dict within an array
which doesn't match the format from the parsed json output of lldpcli.
Change `parse_data` and `main` to use a dict alone for passing interface
neighbors for rendering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
almost every interface can be part of a bridge thus the code for changing STP
cost is best part of the Interface() base class itself.
Commit b5ef10cf ("ifconfig: T2985: support on demand bridge creation")
implemented this change but the STP file was not removed on the test devices
causing tests to pass.
|
|
* 'bridge' of github.com:c-po/vyos-1x:
smoketest: add IPv6 option tests to BasicInterfaceTest
ifconfig: T2985: support on demand bridge creation
geneve: T1799: add IPv6 CLI options
op-mode: add "show arp" command
|
|
|
|
The current implementation for bridge based interfaces has an issue which is
caused by priority inheritance. We always assumed that the bridge interface will
be created last, but this may not be true in all cases, where some interfaces
will be created "on demand" - e.g. OpenVPN or late (VXLAN, GENEVE).
As we already have a bunch of verify steps in place we should not see a bridge
interface leak to the underlaying infrastructure code. This means, whenever an
interface will be member of a bridge, and the bridge does yet not exist, we will
create it in advance in the interface context, as the bridge code will be run
in the same commit but maybe sooner or later.
This will also be the solution for T2924.
|
