Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
VRF support can be tested using:
set vrf name red table 1000
set vrf name red protocols isis domain FOOO
set vrf name red protocols isis net 49.0001.1921.6800.1002.00
set vrf name red protocols isis interface eth1
|
|
As there can only be one running IS-IS process (FRR limitation) there is no need
in having a tagNode here. This adds artifical restrictions/limitations when
moving on to support VRFs for IS-IS protocol.
|
|
Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.
This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.
|
|
The following VyOS CLI config
vrf red {
bgp 100 {
neighbor 1.1.1.1 {
peer-group foo
}
peer-group foo {
passive
password bar
remote-as 200
}
}
}
Will generaste the FRR configuration:
!
router bgp 100 vrf red
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
no bgp network import-check
neighbor foo peer-group
neighbor foo remote-as 200
neighbor foo password bar
neighbor foo passive
neighbor 1.1.1.1 peer-group foo
!
|
|
VyOS CLI config:
vrf red {
ospf {
default-information {
originate {
always
}
}
default-metric 30
passive-interface default
}
}
Will create the FRR configuration snippet:
!
router ospf vrf red
auto-cost reference-bandwidth 100
timers throttle spf 200 1000 10000
passive-interface default
default-metric 30
default-information originate always
!
|
|
set protocols bgp 65010 address-family l2vpn-evpn vni 100 route-target both 516:10516
set protocols bgp 65010 address-family l2vpn-evpn vni 100 rd 192.168.0.1:514
Todo: add verify() step to check if at least one evpn enabled BGP neighbor
exits, else FRR will error out with: This command is only supported under EVPN VRF
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 55c4dd3586a3b0e2fe53ccad75c996b55d9979eb)
|
|
|
|
* set protocols bgp ASN address-family ipv4-unicast maximum-paths
* set protocols bgp ASN address-family ipv4-unicast maximum-paths-ibgp
* set protocols bgp ASN address-family ipv6-unicast maximum-paths
* set protocols bgp ASN address-family ipv6-unicast maximum-paths-ibgp
|
|
|
|
|
|
bgp: T2100: Changing RFC8212 behavior and option toggle
|
|
In this commit we add the default operation within BGP
to have RFC8212 disabled for eBGP routes. This default
should preserve the normal behavior for VyOS from earlier
releases of FRR to the current latest release. Another
option that we add is the ability to toggle whether or
not RFC8212 is enabled or disabled.
|
|
As thought in the beginning the dhcp-interface route option can not be
superseeded by the interface option. When a route is installed for a DHCP
interface, that interface is usually a broadcast interface which can not be
used for plain interface-based routes.
The old Vyatta logic was migrated to Python where the current received
next-hop address from the DHCP interface is installed as next-hop address.
|
|
bgp: T3322: Fix timers for neighbor
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need to exit from the bfd context by end instead of exit, else FRR reload
will get confused:
frr-reload output: 168 2021-02-16 21:13:19,014 DEBUG: LINE
ip prefix-list GLOBAL seq 10 permit 192.168.100.1/32: append to current_context_lines, ['bfd']
|
|
This superseeds GitHub pull request #723 by implementing support to add an OSPF
virtual-link interface which connects different areas to the "no passive-interface"
configuration option when the system uses "passive-interface default".
Setting "protocols ospf passive-interface-exclude vlink0" on the VyOS CLI will
render the FRR OSPF configuration "no passive-interface VLINK0".
|
|
In order to keep the current behavior when upgrading from 1.2 -> 1.3 -> 1.4
FRR requires us to set this option.
This configuration modifies the behavior of the network statement. If you have
this configured the underlying network must exist in the rib (default). If you
have the [no] form configured then BGP will not check for the networks
existence in the rib.
For FRR versions 7.3 and before frr defaults for datacenter were the network
must exist, traditional did not check for existence. For versions 7.4 and
beyond both traditional and datacenter the network must exist.
VyOS uses "traditional".
|
|
|
|
bfd: T3310: migrate to get_config_dict() and FRR reload
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* protocols bgp 65000 neighbor 192.0.2.1 address-family ipv4-unicast addpath-tx-all
* protocols bgp 65000 neighbor 192.0.2.1 address-family ipv4-unicast addpath-tx-per-as
* protocols bgp 65000 neighbor 2001:db8::1 address-family ipv6-unicast addpath-tx-all
* protocols bgp 65000 neighbor 2001:db8::1 address-family ipv6-unicast addpath-tx-per-as
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following options were not represented in the Jinja2 template:
- port
- advertisement-interval
- strict-capability-match
In addition the smoketests have been extended to support IPv6 neighbors, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add CLI options for:
- advertise-pip
- rt-auto-derive
- flooding
- rd
- route-target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new CLI
|
|
|
|
Added "set protocols ospf interface eth1 hello-multiplier <n>" CLI command. This
is mutually exclusive to "set protocols ospf interface eth1 dead-interval <n>".
|
|
|
|
interface"
For easier maintenance and operability move the interface specific protocol
setting of OSPF to the OSPF protocol section. This is now also in-line with IS-IS.
This means to migrate:
ethernet eth0 {
vif 202 {
ip {
ospf {
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyosvyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
}
}
}
to
protocols {
ospf {
interface eth0.201 {
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyosvyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
}
|
|
|
|
This commit provides the implementation of the OSPF CLI with a Jinja2 template
that is loaded by FRR reload.
|
|
|
|
This is an amendment to commit 5ab6882f ("bgp: T2347: bugfix import/export
route-map") which did not take care about fixing the other two if/elif
statements.
|