| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
In the implementation of T3042, it will cause two problems:
1. Even if VLAN awareness is not enabled, the VLAN settings of the
vlan filter will be modified. When the bridge member has a WLAN interface,
the error is exposed, so repair it here. You should not modify the
related settings when the VLAN awareness mode is not enabled
2. Even if VLAN awareness is not enabled, the VLAN settings of the
vlan filter will be modified. When the bridge member has a WLAN interface,
due to special settings, the bridge mode cannot be entered and the settings
cannot be completed directly. Therefore, the WLAN interface should be rejected
Enter the bridge with VLAN awareness
|
|
In #601, I provided a basic patch. Under this patch, I rely on vif to
detect the vlan id range that the bridge should flow through,
which may lead to greater redundancy in the configuration,
so I am considering detecting effective vlan filters In setting the range
of vlan id that is required to flow through the bridge,
I use set() to complete the deduplication of this vlan id
and set it to the bridge uniformly (at the same time,
I slightly modified the smoke test script)
|
|
1. Due to the previous focus on the implementation of VLAN filter, it was not considered to include MTU settings, which will lead to MTU setting errors in some cases
2. In order to make VLAN aware of the work of the bridge, it is necessary to specify the allowed VLAN ID range for the bridge itself, and forget to join it before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renamed using snippet below:
----------------------------
for file in $(find . -name "*.py")
do
sed -i "s/vyos_dict_search/dict_search/" $file
done
|
|
almost every interface can be part of a bridge thus the code for changing STP
cost is best part of the Interface() base class itself.
Commit b5ef10cf ("ifconfig: T2985: support on demand bridge creation")
implemented this change but the STP file was not removed on the test devices
causing tests to pass.
|
|
The current implementation for bridge based interfaces has an issue which is
caused by priority inheritance. We always assumed that the bridge interface will
be created last, but this may not be true in all cases, where some interfaces
will be created "on demand" - e.g. OpenVPN or late (VXLAN, GENEVE).
As we already have a bunch of verify steps in place we should not see a bridge
interface leak to the underlaying infrastructure code. This means, whenever an
interface will be member of a bridge, and the bridge does yet not exist, we will
create it in advance in the interface context, as the bridge code will be run
in the same commit but maybe sooner or later.
This will also be the solution for T2924.
|
|
When removing e.g. a macsec interface and also its associated member interface
from the bridge, it will happen that the macsec interface instance is long gone
before we reach the code in the bridge interface which will remove it from the
bridge itself.
When this is the case, we can not call BridgeIf.del_port() as it will throw an
exception that the interface does not exist. We now only remove a bridge member
if the interface in question is still available in the kernel.
|
|
|
|
Commit 29dd5079 ("ifconfig: T2653: remove duplicated code for address flush")
used the class method for address flushing, but it was cvalled in the wrong way.
|
|
|
|
Every derived class must implement update() to set the interfaces admin
up/down state. This is required to prevend extensive link flaps when e.g.
reconfiguring bond interfaces.
|
|
The current VyOS CLI parser code written in Python contains a ton of duplicates
which I can also hold myself accountable for - or maybe mainly me - depends on
the angle of judge.
While providing a new update() method in vyos.ifconfig.interfaces() this is
extended for bridge interfaces in the derived bridge class.
Signed-off-by: Christian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
__init__ should be added to a derived class only if it does work in the ctor.
|
|
|
