| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* T5195: move run, cmd, call, rc_cmd helper to vyos.utils.process
* T5195: use read_file and write_file implementation from vyos.utils.file
Changed code automatically using:
find . -type f -not -path '*/\.*' -exec sed -i 's/^from vyos.util import read_file$/from vyos.utils.file import read_file/g' {} +
find . -type f -not -path '*/\.*' -exec sed -i 's/^from vyos.util import write_file$/from vyos.utils.file import write_file/g' {} +
* T5195: move chmod* helpers to vyos.utils.permission
* T5195: use colon_separated_to_dict from vyos.utils.dict
* T5195: move is_systemd_service_* to vyos.utils.process
* T5195: fix boot issues with missing imports
* T5195: move dict_search_* helpers to vyos.utils.dict
* T5195: move network helpers to vyos.utils.network
* T5195: move commit_* helpers to vyos.utils.commit
* T5195: move user I/O helpers to vyos.utils.io
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no need for protocol specific embedded smoketests as the route-map
option got removed. Tests are now conducted under the new CLI tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removing the Zebra/Linux Kernel route-map added by "set protocols static route-map"
was not removed once applied. This was because the removal must happen within
the zebra daemon and not staticd.
|
|
When we leak routes to a VRF it is verified that the target VRF actually
exists.
|
|
Currently every smoketest does the setup and destruction of the configsession
on its own durin setUp(). This creates a lot of overhead and one configsession
should be re-used during execution of every smoketest script.
In addiion a test that failed will leaf the system in an unconsistent state.
For this reason before the test is executed we will save the running config
to /tmp and the will re-load the config after the test has passed, always
ensuring a clean environment for the next test.
|
|
|
|
Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.
This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.
|
|
As we have upgrade to FRR 7.5 in current the issue within FRR vtysh [1]
is fixed.
[1]: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/8016
|
|
|
|
|
