From 2490b60c2772c58e2c92f0d453565619ea2d9b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 17:07:04 +0200
Subject: wireguard: T2228: support ports < 1024

There is no legit reason to not allow ports < 1024.
---
 interface-definitions/wireguard.xml | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'interface-definitions/wireguard.xml')

diff --git a/interface-definitions/wireguard.xml b/interface-definitions/wireguard.xml
index 8ac243d92..f580cd833 100644
--- a/interface-definitions/wireguard.xml
+++ b/interface-definitions/wireguard.xml
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
         <children>
           <leafNode name="address">
             <properties>
-              <help>IP address</help> 
+              <help>IP address</help>
               <constraint>
                 <validator name="cidr"/>
               </constraint>
@@ -51,8 +51,12 @@
           <leafNode name="port">
             <properties>
               <help>Local port number to accept connections</help>
+              <valueHelp>
+                  <format>1-65535</format>
+                  <description>Numeric IP port</description>
+              </valueHelp>
               <constraint>
-                <validator name="numeric" argument="--range 1024-65535"/>
+                <validator name="numeric" argument="--range 1-65535"/>
               </constraint>
             </properties>
           </leafNode>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3