summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com>2019-11-06 18:36:48 +0100
committerChristian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com>2019-11-06 18:43:43 +0100
commit6620b221ba301268998bf3354af0ef673cd42127 (patch)
tree5d0b0df944df0df9f6d4bee457c8947ddf52eb9c
parentc9a8f16cce2c40ec350431d3a5122489603675e8 (diff)
downloadvyos-documentation-6620b221ba301268998bf3354af0ef673cd42127.tar.gz
vyos-documentation-6620b221ba301268998bf3354af0ef673cd42127.zip
contribution: improve coding-guideline examples
- Use indent 4 spaces for Python - Use indent 2 spaces on XML - Note about xmllint
-rw-r--r--docs/contributing/coding_guidelines.rst156
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 55 deletions
diff --git a/docs/contributing/coding_guidelines.rst b/docs/contributing/coding_guidelines.rst
index 9c996518..771290ca 100644
--- a/docs/contributing/coding_guidelines.rst
+++ b/docs/contributing/coding_guidelines.rst
@@ -3,21 +3,49 @@
Python Coding Guidelines
========================
-The switch to the Python programming language for new code is not merely a change
-of the language, but a chance to rethink and improve the programming approach.
+The switch to the Python programming language for new code is not merely a
+change of the language, but a chance to rethink and improve the programming
+approach.
Let's face it: VyOS is full of spaghetti code where logic for reading the VyOS
config, generating daemon configs, and restarting processes is all mixed up.
-Python (or any other language, for that matter) does not provide automatic protection
-from bad design, so we need to also devise design guidelines and follow them to
-keep the system extensible and maintainable.
+Python (or any other language, for that matter) does not provide automatic
+protection from bad design, so we need to also devise design guidelines and
+follow them to keep the system extensible and maintainable.
+
+But we are here to assist you and want to guide you through how you can become
+a good VyOS contributor. The rules we have are not there to punish you - the
+rules are in place to help us all. What does it mean? By having a consistent
+coding style it becomes very easy for new contributors and also longtime
+contributors to navigate through the sources and all the implied logic of
+the spaghetti code.
+
+Please use the following template as good starting point when developing new
+modules or even rewrite a whole bunch of code in the new style XML/Pyhon
+interface.
Configuration script structure and behaviour
--------------------------------------------
.. code-block:: python
+ #!/usr/bin/env python3
+ #
+ # Copyright (C) 2019 VyOS maintainers and contributors
+ #
+ # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 or later as
+ # published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ #
+ # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ # GNU General Public License for more details.
+ #
+ # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
import sys
from vyos.config import Config
@@ -50,36 +78,39 @@ Configuration script structure and behaviour
print(e)
sys.exit(1)
-The **get_config()** function must convert the VyOS config to an abstract internal
-representation. No other function is allowed to call ``vyos.config.Config`` object
-methods directly. The rationale for it is that when config reads are mixed with
-other logic, it's very hard to change the config syntax since you need to weed
-out every occurrence of the old syntax. If syntax-specific code is confined to a
-single function, the rest of the code can be left untouched as long as the
-internal representation remains compatible.
-
-Another advantage is testability of the code. Mocking the entire config subsystem
-is hard, while constructing an internal representation by hand is way simpler.
-
-The **verify()** function takes an internal representation of the config and checks
-if it's valid, otherwise it must raise ``VyOSError`` with an error message that
-describes the problem and possibly suggests how to fix it. It must not make any
-changes to the system. The rationale for it is again testability and, in the
-future when the config backend is ready and every script is rewritten in this
-fashion, ability to execute commit dry run ("commit test" like in JunOS) and abort
-commit before making any changes to the system if an error is found in any component.
-
-The **generate()** function generates config files for system components.
-
-The **apply()** function applies the generated configuration to the live system.
-It should use non-disruptive reload whenever possible. It may execute disruptive
-operations such as daemon process restart if a particular component does not
-support non-disruptive reload, or when the expected service degradation is minimal
-(for example, in case of auxiliary services such as LLDPd). In case of high impact
-services such as VPN daemon and routing protocols, when non-disruptive reload is
-supported for some but not all types of configuration changes, scripts authors
-should make effort to determine if a configuration change can be done in a
-non-disruptive way and only resort to disruptive restart if it cannot be avoided.
+The ``get_config()`` function must convert the VyOS config to an abstract,
+internal representation. No other function is allowed to call the ``vyos.config.
+Config`` object method directly. The rationale for it is that when config reads
+are mixed with other logic, it's very hard to change the config syntax since
+you need to weed out every occurrence of the old syntax. If syntax-specific
+code is confined to a single function, the rest of the code can be left
+untouched as long as the internal representation remains compatible.
+
+Another advantage is testability of the code. Mocking the entire config
+subsystem is hard, while constructing an internal representation by hand is
+way simpler.
+
+The ``verify()`` function takes your internal representation of the config and
+checks if it's valid, otherwise it must raise ``ConfigError`` with an error
+message that describes the problem and possibly suggests how to fix it. It must
+not make any changes to the system. The rationale for it is again testability
+and, in the future when the config backend is ready and every script is
+rewritten in this fashion, ability to execute commit dry run ("commit test"
+like in JunOS) and abort commit before making any changes to the system if an
+error is found in any component.
+
+The ``generate()`` function generates config files for system components.
+
+The ``apply()`` function applies the generated configuration to the live
+system. It should use non-disruptive reload whenever possible. It may execute
+disruptive operations such as daemon process restart if a particular component
+does not support non-disruptive reload, or when the expected service degradation
+is minimal (for example, in case of auxiliary services such as LLDPd). In case
+of high impact services such as VPN daemon and routing protocols, when non-
+disruptive reload is supported for some but not all types of configuration
+changes, scripts authors should make effort to determine if a configuration
+change can be done in a non-disruptive way and only resort to disruptive restart
+if it cannot be avoided.
Unless absolutely necessary, configuration scripts should not modify the active
configuration of system components directly. Whenever at all possible, scripts
@@ -89,34 +120,50 @@ one by one is particularly discouraged, for example, when configuring netfilter
rules, saving them to a file and loading it with iptables-restore should always
be preferred to executing iptables directly.
-The **apply()** and **generate()** functions may ``raise ConfigError`` if, for
+The ``apply()`` and ``generate()`` functions may ``raise ConfigError`` if, for
example, the daemon failed to start with the updated config. It shouldn't be a
-substitute for proper config checking in the **verify()** function. All reasonable
-effort should be made to verify that generated configuration is valid and will
-be accepted by the daemon, including, when necessary, cross-checks with other
-VyOS configuration subtrees.
-
-Exceptions, including ``VyOSError`` (which is raised by ``vyos.config.Config`` on
-improper config operations, such as trying to use ``list_nodes()`` on a non-tag
-node) should not be silenced or caught and re-raised as config error. Sure this
-will not look pretty on user's screen, but it will make way better bug reports,
-and help users (and most VyOS users are IT professionals) do their own debugging
-as well.
+substitute for proper config checking in the ``verify()`` function. All
+reasonable effort should be made to verify that generated configuration is
+valid and will be accepted by the daemon, including, when necessary, cross-
+checks with other VyOS configuration subtrees.
+
+Exceptions, including ``VyOSError`` (which is raised by ``vyos.config.Config``
+on improper config operations, such as trying to use ``list_nodes()`` on a
+non-tag node) should not be silenced or caught and re-raised as config error.
+Sure this will not look pretty on user's screen, but it will make way better
+bug reports, and help users (and most VyOS users are IT professionals) do their
+own debugging as well.
+
+For easy orientation we suggest you take a look on the ``ntp.py`` or
+``interfaces-bonding.py`` (for tag nodes) implementation. Both files can be
+found in the vyos-1x_ repository.
+
Coding guidelines
-----------------
+Like any other project we have some small guidelines about our source code, too.
+The rules we have are not there to punish you - the rules are in place to help
+us all. By having a consistent coding style it becomes very easy for new
+and also longtime contributors to navigate through the sources and all the
+implied logic of any one source file..
+
Language
********
-Python 3 **shall** be used. How long can we keep Python 2 alive anyway?
-
-No considerations for Python 2 compatibility **should** be taken.
+Python 3 **shall** be used. How long can we keep Python 2 alive anyway? No
+considerations for Python 2 compatibility **should** be taken at any time.
Formatting
**********
-Tabs **shall not** be used. Every indentation level should be 4 spaces.
+* Python: Tabs **shall not** be used. Every indentation level should be 4 spaces
+* XML: Tabs **shall not** be used. Every indentation level should be 2 spaces
+
+.. note: There are extensions to e.g. VIM (xmllint) which will help you to get
+ your indention levels correct. Add to following to your .vimrc file:
+ ``au FileType xml setlocal equalprg=xmllint\ --format\ --recover\ -\
+ 2>/dev/null`` now you can call the linter using ``gg=G`` in command mode.
Text generation
***************
@@ -134,11 +181,10 @@ Code policy
When modifying the source code, remember these rules of the legacy elimination
campaign:
- * No new features in Perl
- * No old style command definitions
- * No code incompatible with Python3
+* No new features in Perl
+* No old style command definitions
+* No code incompatible with Python3
.. _process: https://blog.vyos.io/vyos-development-digest-10
.. _vyos-1x: https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/blob/current/schema/
.. _VyConf: https://github.com/vyos/vyconf/blob/master/data/schemata
-