1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
|
NAT
===
Source NAT
----------
Source NAT is typically referred to simply as NAT. To be more correct, what
most people refer to as NAT is actually the process of **Port Address
Translation (PAT)**, or **NAT Overload**. The process of having many internal
host systems communicate to the Internet using a single or subset of IP
addresses.
To setup SNAT, we need to know:
* The internal IP addresses we want to translate
* The outgoing interface to perform the translation on
* The external IP address to translate to
In the example used for the Quick Start configuration above, we demonstrate
the following configuration:
set nat source rule 100 outbound-interface 'eth0'
set nat source rule 100 source address '192.168.0.0/24'
set nat source rule 100 translation address 'masquerade'
Which generates the following configuration:
.. code-block:: sh
rule 100 {
outbound-interface eth0
source {
address 192.168.0.0/24
}
translation {
address masquerade
}
}
In this example, we use **masquerade** as the translation address instead of
an IP address. The **masquerade** target is effectively an alias to say "use
whatever IP address is on the outgoing interface", rather than a statically
configured IP address. This is useful if you use DHCP for your outgoing
interface and do not know what the external address will be.
When using NAT for a large number of host systems it recommended that a
minimum of 1 IP address is used to NAT every 256 host systems. This is due to
the limit of 65,000 port numbers available for unique translations and a
reserving an average of 200-300 sessions per host system.
Example: For an ~8,000 host network a source NAT pool of 32 IP addresses is
recommended.
A pool of addresses can be defined by using a **-** in the **set nat source
rule [n] translation address** statement.
.. code-block:: sh
set nat source rule 100 translation address '203.0.113.32-203.0.113.63'
**Note:** Avoiding "leaky" NAT
Linux netfilter will not NAT traffic marked as INVALID. This often confuses
people into thinking that Linux (or specifically VyOS) has a broken NAT
implementation because non-NATed traffic is seen leaving an external interface.
This is actually working as intended, and a packet capture of the "leaky"
traffic should reveal that the traffic is either an additional TCP "RST",
"FIN,ACK", or "RST,ACK" sent by client systems after Linux netfilter considers
the connection closed. The most common is the additional TCP RST some host
implementations send after terminating a connection (which is implementation-
specific).
In other words, connection tracking has already observed the connection be
closed and has transition the flow to INVALID to prevent attacks from
attempting to reuse the connection.
You can avoid the "leaky" behavior by using a firewall policy that drops
"invalid" state packets.
Having control over the matching of INVALID state traffic, e.g. the ability to
selectively log, is an important troubleshooting tool for observing broken
protocol behavior. For this reason, VyOS does not globally drop invalid state
traffic, instead allowing the operator to make the determination on how the
traffic is handled.
**Note:** Avoiding NAT breakage in the absence of split-DNS
A typical problem with using NAT and hosting public servers is the ability for
internal systems to reach an internal server using it's external IP address.
The solution to this is usually the use of split-DNS to correctly point host
systems to the internal address when requests are made internally. Because
many smaller networks lack DNS infrastructure, a work-around is commonly
deployed to facilitate the traffic by NATing the request from internal hosts
to the source address of the internal interface on the firewall. This technique
is commonly reffered to as **NAT Reflection**, or **Hairpin NAT**.
In this example, we will be using the example Quick Start configuration above
as a starting point.
To setup a NAT reflection rule, we need to create a rule to NAT connections
from the internal network to the same internal network to use the source
address of the internal interface.
.. code-block:: sh
set nat source rule 110 description 'NAT Reflection: INSIDE'
set nat source rule 110 destination address '192.168.0.0/24'
set nat source rule 110 outbound-interface 'eth1'
set nat source rule 110 source address '192.168.0.0/24'
set nat source rule 110 translation address 'masquerade'
Which results in a configuration of:
.. code-block:: sh
rule 110 {
description "NAT Reflection: INSIDE"
destination {
address 192.168.0.0/24
}
outbound-interface eth1
source {
address 192.168.0.0/24
}
translation {
address masquerade
}
}
Destination NAT
---------------
DNAT is typically referred to as a **Port Forward**. When using VyOS as a NAT
router and firewall, a common configuration task is to redirect incoming
traffic to a system behind the firewall.
In this example, we will be using the example Quick Start configuration above
as a starting point.
To setup a destination NAT rule we need to gather:
* The interface traffic will be coming in on
* The protocol and port we wish to forward
* The IP address of the internal system we wish to forward traffic to
In our example, we will be forwarding web server traffic to an internal web
server on 192.168.0.100. HTTP traffic makes use of the TCP protocol on port 80.
For other common port numbers, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
Our configuration commands would be:
.. code-block:: sh
set nat destination rule 10 description 'Port Forward: HTTP to 192.168.0.100'
set nat destination rule 10 destination port '80'
set nat destination rule 10 inbound-interface 'eth0'
set nat destination rule 10 protocol 'tcp'
set nat destination rule 10 translation address '192.168.0.100'
Which would generate the following NAT destination configuration:
.. code-block:: sh
nat {
destination {
rule 10 {
description "Port Forward: HTTP to 192.168.0.100"
destination {
port 80
}
inbound-interface eth0
protocol tcp
translation {
address 192.168.0.100
}
}
}
}
Note that if forwarding traffic to a different port than it is arriving on,
you may also configure the translation port using **set nat destination rule
[n] translation port**.
This establishes our Port Forward rule, but if we created a firewall policy it
will likely block the traffic.
It is important to note that when creating firewall rules that the DNAT
translation occurs **before** traffic traverses the firewall. In other words,
the destination address has already been translated to 192.168.0.100.
So in our firewall policy, we want to allow traffic coming in on the outside
interface, destined for TCP port 80 and the IP address of 192.168.0.100.
.. code-block:: sh
set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 action 'accept'
set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 destination address '192.168.0.100'
set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 destination port '80'
set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 protocol 'tcp'
set firewall name OUTSIDE-IN rule 20 state new 'enable'
This would generate the following configuration:
.. code-block:: sh
rule 20 {
action accept
destination {
address 192.168.0.100
port 80
}
protocol tcp
state {
new enable
}
}
**NOTE**: If you have configured the `INSIDE-OUT` policy, you will need to add
additional rules to permit inbound NAT traffic.
1-to-1 NAT
----------
Another term often used for DNAT is **1-to-1 NAT**. For a 1-to-1 NAT
configuration, both DNAT and SNAT are used to NAT all traffic from an external
IP address to an internal IP address and vice-versa.
Typically, a 1-to-1 NAT rule omits the destination port (all ports) and
replaces the protocol with either **all** or **ip**.
Then a corresponding SNAT rule is created to NAT outgoing traffic for the
internal IP to a reserved external IP. This dedicates an external IP address
to an internal IP address and is useful for protocols which don't have the
notion of ports, such as GRE.
1-to-1 NAT example
------------------
Here's an extract of a simple 1-to-1 NAT configuration with one internal and
one external interface:
.. code-block:: sh
set interfaces ethernet eth0 address '192.168.1.1/24'
set interfaces ethernet eth0 description 'Inside interface'
set interfaces ethernet eth1 address '1.2.3.4/24'
set interfaces ethernet eth1 description 'Outside interface'
set nat destination rule 2000 description '1-to-1 NAT example'
set nat destination rule 2000 destination address '1.2.3.4'
set nat destination rule 2000 inbound-interface 'eth1'
set nat destination rule 2000 translation address '192.168.1.10'
set nat source rule 2000 description '1-to-1 NAT example'
set nat source rule 2000 outbound-interface 'eth1'
set nat source rule 2000 source address '192.168.1.10'
set nat source rule 2000 translation address '1.2.3.4'
Firewall rules are written as normal, using the internal IP address as the
source of outbound rules and the destination of inbound rules.
NPTv6 (RFC6296)
---------------
See here : [[How_to_do_NPTv6]]
|