#! /bin/sh -e if [ $# -eq 3 -a "$2" = '-d' ]; then pdir="-d $3" elif [ $# -ne 1 ]; then echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" exit 1 fi case "$1" in -patch) patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p0 < $0;; -unpatch) patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p0 < $0;; *) echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" exit 1 esac exit 0 # DP: bash-3.2 upstream patch bash32-030 BASH PATCH REPORT ================= Bash-Release: 3.2 Patch-ID: bash32-030 Bug-Reported-by: Paul Eggert Andreas Schwab Bug-Reference-ID: <877il0nu84.fsf_-_@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2007-11/msg00023.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2007-11/msg00022.htmlhttp://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2007-11/msg00022.html Bug-Description: If redirections attached to a compound command fail, bash does not set the command's exit status correctly. This only happens when the command is the first in a sequential list. Patch: *** ../bash-3.2-patched/execute_cmd.c 2007-03-24 14:51:05.000000000 -0400 --- execute_cmd.c 2007-11-05 22:31:14.000000000 -0500 *************** *** 615,619 **** redirection_undo_list = (REDIRECT *)NULL; dispose_exec_redirects (); ! return (EXECUTION_FAILURE); } --- 620,624 ---- redirection_undo_list = (REDIRECT *)NULL; dispose_exec_redirects (); ! return (last_command_exit_value = EXECUTION_FAILURE); } *** ../bash-3.2/patchlevel.h Thu Apr 13 08:31:04 2006 --- patchlevel.h Mon Oct 16 14:22:54 2006 *************** *** 26,30 **** looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */ ! #define PATCHLEVEL 29 #endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */ --- 26,30 ---- looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */ ! #define PATCHLEVEL 30 #endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */