diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | src/common/unionfs.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/common/unionfs.c b/src/common/unionfs.c index 8f7341a..d5f9d3f 100644 --- a/src/common/unionfs.c +++ b/src/common/unionfs.c @@ -231,7 +231,13 @@ retrieve_data(char* rel_data_path, GNode *node, char* root, NODE_OPERATION op) } //either multi or tag--shouldn't have made a difference, but arkady was confused. vn->_config._multi = (def.tag | def.multi); - vn->_config._priority = def.def_priority; + if (def.def_priority == 0) { + vn->_config._priority = LOWEST_PRIORITY; + } + else { + vn->_config._priority = def.def_priority; + } + } } @@ -248,6 +254,16 @@ retrieve_data(char* rel_data_path, GNode *node, char* root, NODE_OPERATION op) if (vn_parent->_config._multi == TRUE) { ((struct VyattaNode*)node->data)->_data._value = TRUE; + //patch up to preserve multinode behavior on value node, can also put node.def on node.tag with priority + //Need to do two things: + // 1. Come to agreement on where the behavior splits on priority multinodes + // 2. Not check for tag node in the def datastructure but use the new datastructure as at some point tag and multi will be the same + if (vn_parent->_config._def.tag == TRUE) { //only for embedded multinodes + vn->_config._priority = vn_parent->_config._priority; + vn_parent->_config._priority = LOWEST_PRIORITY; + } + + //now let's patch up the def multi-nodes //move the def for the multinode from the parent to the value node struct VyattaNode* vn2 = (struct VyattaNode*)node->data; |