vyos-1x.git/src/migration-scripts/vrf/1-to-2, branch vyos/1.4dev1VyOS command definitions, scripts, and utilities (mirror of https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x.git)
https://git.amelek.net/vyos/vyos-1x.git/atom?h=vyos%2F1.4dev12023-08-02T09:12:23+00:00T5427: Fix migration script arguments len expects 2 args2023-08-02T09:12:23+00:00Viacheslav Hletenkov.gletenko@vyos.io2023-08-02T09:12:23+00:00urn:sha1:d1923b7b58795f0d9635ae0e8df110f591881bdf
The script's name is always provided as the first argument sys.argv[0]
Expected length for argv is 2 (script itself + config file)
Change: 'if (len(argv) < 1)' to 'if len(argv) < 2'
vrf: route: static: T2450: we also need to migrate the interface based routes2021-07-12T16:38:41+00:00Christian Poessingerchristian@poessinger.com2021-07-12T16:38:14+00:00urn:sha1:73e58b7d000c92608b263f2f52b60d21d741db04
Previously during migration if one had used interface routes, the VRF based
ones got not migrated.
The following "old" VyOS 1.3 configuration did not get migrated:
set protocols static interface-route 10.20.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth2 next-hop-vrf 'blue'
set protocols static interface-route 10.30.0.0/24 next-hop-interface br10 next-hop-vrf 'red'
set protocols vrf blue static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default'
set protocols vrf red static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default'
set vrf name blue table '3000'
set vrf name mgmt table '1000'
set vrf name red table '2000'
It must get migrated to:
set protocols static route 10.20.0.0/24 interface eth2 vrf 'blue'
set protocols static route 10.30.0.0/24 interface br10 vrf 'red'
set vrf name blue protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default'
set vrf name blue table '3000'
set vrf name mgmt table '1000'
set vrf name red protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default'
set vrf name red table '2000'
vrf: T3344: move dynamic routing protocols under "vrf name <name> protocols"2021-03-14T13:46:01+00:00Christian Poessingerchristian@poessinger.com2021-03-13T20:08:38+00:00urn:sha1:548d9057e3ed66852bb2be62fe770c265712b4f3
Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.
This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.