diff options
author | Christian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com> | 2021-04-15 23:09:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com> | 2021-04-15 23:11:48 +0200 |
commit | d712964570b3475928d3b9eb08602292cb00ff82 (patch) | |
tree | 7917ecab08c4b509283bf002f5dda31bec9b1fef /smoketest/scripts | |
parent | dfc1bc6b8ebca1dd761071ea4af30597d6d09313 (diff) | |
download | vyos-1x-d712964570b3475928d3b9eb08602292cb00ff82.tar.gz vyos-1x-d712964570b3475928d3b9eb08602292cb00ff82.zip |
smoketest: policy: inherit sequence numbers
In the vyatta-cfg-quagga days the access-list(6) or prefix-list(6) sequence
numbers have been made up artifically. The new implementation from vyos-1x will
re-use the rule number specified on the CLI as the sequence number, this we have
to alter the tast cases to get a proper match from the beginning - covering
both the old and new world.
This can be done by using rule numbers that are multiples of 5.
Diffstat (limited to 'smoketest/scripts')
-rwxr-xr-x | smoketest/scripts/cli/test_policy.py | 113 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/smoketest/scripts/cli/test_policy.py b/smoketest/scripts/cli/test_policy.py index 57557af68..242c013b8 100755 --- a/smoketest/scripts/cli/test_policy.py +++ b/smoketest/scripts/cli/test_policy.py @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, '150' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'source' : { 'any' : '' }, 'destination' : { 'host' : '2.2.2.2' }, @@ -59,32 +59,32 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, '2000' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'destination' : { 'any' : '' }, 'source' : { 'network' : '10.0.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.255.255.255' }, }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'destination' : { 'any' : '' }, 'source' : { 'network' : '172.16.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.15.255.255' }, }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'destination' : { 'any' : '' }, 'source' : { 'network' : '192.168.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.0.255.255' }, }, - '50' : { + '20' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'destination' : { 'network' : '172.16.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.15.255.255' }, 'source' : { 'network' : '10.0.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.255.255.255' }, }, - '60' : { + '25' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'destination' : { 'network' : '192.168.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.0.255.255' }, 'source' : { 'network' : '172.16.0.0', 'inverse-mask' : '0.15.255.255' }, }, - '70' : { + '30' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'destination' : { 'any' : '' }, 'source' : { 'any' : '' }, @@ -115,9 +115,8 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): config = self.getFRRconfig('access-list', end='') for acl, acl_config in acls.items(): - seq = '5' for rule, rule_config in acl_config['rule'].items(): - tmp = f'access-list {acl} seq {seq}' + tmp = f'access-list {acl} seq {rule}' if rule_config['action'] == 'permit': tmp += ' permit' else: @@ -131,12 +130,16 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): if 'any' in rule_config[direction]: tmp += ' any' if 'host' in rule_config[direction]: + # XXX: Some weird side rule from the old vyatta days + # possible to clean this up after the vyos-1x migration + if int(acl) in range(100, 200) or int(acl) in range(2000, 2700): + tmp += ' host' + tmp += ' ' + rule_config[direction]['host'] if 'network' in rule_config[direction]: tmp += ' ' + rule_config[direction]['network'] + ' ' + rule_config[direction]['inverse-mask'] self.assertIn(tmp, config) - seq = int(seq) + 5 def test_access_list6(self): acls = { @@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): 'action' : 'deny', 'source' : { 'network' : '2001:db8:10::/48', 'exact-match' : '' }, }, - '10' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'source' : { 'network' : '2001:db8:20::/48' }, }, @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): 'action' : 'deny', 'source' : { 'network' : '2001:db8:40::/64', 'exact-match' : '' }, }, - '100' : { + '25' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'source' : { 'any' : '' }, }, @@ -203,9 +206,8 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): config = self.getFRRconfig('ipv6 access-list', end='') for acl, acl_config in acls.items(): - seq = '5' for rule, rule_config in acl_config['rule'].items(): - tmp = f'ipv6 access-list {acl} seq {seq}' + tmp = f'ipv6 access-list {acl} seq {rule}' if rule_config['action'] == 'permit': tmp += ' permit' else: @@ -224,22 +226,21 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): tmp += ' exact-match' self.assertIn(tmp, config) - seq = int(seq) + 5 def test_as_path_list(self): test_data = { 'VyOS' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '^44501 64502$', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '44501|44502|44503', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '^44501_([0-9]+_)+', }, @@ -247,19 +248,19 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, 'Customers' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_10_', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_20_', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_30_', }, - '30' : { + '20' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '_40_', }, @@ -267,19 +268,19 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, 'bogons' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_0_', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_23456_', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_6449[6-9]_|_65[0-4][0-9][0-9]_|_655[0-4][0-9]_|_6555[0-1]_', }, - '30' : { + '20' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '_6555[2-9]_|_655[6-9][0-9]_|_65[6-9][0-9][0-9]_|_6[6-9][0-9][0-9][0-]_|_[7-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_|_1[0-2][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_|_130[0-9][0-9][0-9]_|_1310[0-6][0-9]_|_13107[01]_', }, @@ -321,7 +322,7 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): test_data = { '100' : { 'rule' : { - '4' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '.*', }, @@ -329,15 +330,15 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, '200' : { 'rule' : { - '1' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '^1:201$', }, - '2' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '1:101$', }, - '3' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '^1:100$', }, @@ -364,9 +365,8 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): if 'rule' not in comm_list_config: continue - seq = '5' for rule, rule_config in comm_list_config['rule'].items(): - tmp = f'bgp community-list {comm_list} seq {seq}' + tmp = f'bgp community-list {comm_list} seq {rule}' if rule_config['action'] == 'permit': tmp += ' permit' else: @@ -375,13 +375,12 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): tmp += ' ' + rule_config['regex'] self.assertIn(tmp, config) - seq = int(seq) + 5 def test_extended_community_list(self): test_data = { 'foo' : { 'rule' : { - '4' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '.*', }, @@ -389,15 +388,15 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, '200' : { 'rule' : { - '1' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '^1:201$', }, - '2' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '1:101$', }, - '3' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'regex' : '^1:100$', }, @@ -424,14 +423,13 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): if 'rule' not in comm_list_config: continue - seq = '5' for rule, rule_config in comm_list_config['rule'].items(): # if the community is not a number but a name, the expanded # keyword is used expanded = '' if not comm_list.isnumeric(): expanded = ' expanded' - tmp = f'bgp extcommunity-list{expanded} {comm_list} seq {seq}' + tmp = f'bgp extcommunity-list{expanded} {comm_list} seq {rule}' if rule_config['action'] == 'permit': tmp += ' permit' @@ -441,14 +439,13 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): tmp += ' ' + rule_config['regex'] self.assertIn(tmp, config) - seq = int(seq) + 5 def test_large_community_list(self): test_data = { 'foo' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '667:123:100', }, @@ -456,15 +453,15 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, 'bar' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '65000:120:10', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '65000:120:20', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'regex' : '65000:120:30', }, @@ -491,9 +488,8 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): if 'rule' not in comm_list_config: continue - seq = '5' for rule, rule_config in comm_list_config['rule'].items(): - tmp = f'bgp large-community-list expanded {comm_list} seq {seq}' + tmp = f'bgp large-community-list expanded {comm_list} seq {rule}' if rule_config['action'] == 'permit': tmp += ' permit' @@ -503,25 +499,24 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): tmp += ' ' + rule_config['regex'] self.assertIn(tmp, config) - seq = int(seq) + 5 def test_prefix_list(self): test_data = { 'foo' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '10.0.0.0/8', 'ge' : '16', 'le' : '24', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'prefix' : '172.16.0.0/12', 'ge' : '16', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '192.168.0.0/16', }, @@ -529,18 +524,18 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, 'bar' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '10.0.10.0/24', 'ge' : '25', 'le' : '26', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'prefix' : '10.0.20.0/24', 'le' : '25', }, - '25' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '10.0.25.0/24', }, @@ -593,18 +588,18 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): test_data = { 'foo' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '2001:db8::/32', 'ge' : '40', 'le' : '48', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'prefix' : '2001:db8::/32', 'ge' : '48', }, - '30' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '2001:db8:1000::/64', }, @@ -612,17 +607,17 @@ class TestPolicy(VyOSUnitTestSHIM.TestCase): }, 'bar' : { 'rule' : { - '10' : { + '5' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '2001:db8:100::/40', 'ge' : '48', }, - '20' : { + '10' : { 'action' : 'permit', 'prefix' : '2001:db8:200::/40', 'ge' : '48', }, - '25' : { + '15' : { 'action' : 'deny', 'prefix' : '2001:db8:300::/40', 'le' : '64', |