| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to a wrong bug [1] there is no longer a vrf suffix available for
interfaces. This got changed in [2] which no longer print vrf name for
interface config when using vrf-lite.
1: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/10805
2: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/10411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every node in running config now has an explicit "exit" tag
|
|
FRR 7.5
router ospf
passive-interface default
no passive-interface eth0.202
Changed int FRR 8 to
interface eth0.202
no ip ospf passive
!
router ospf
ospf router-id 172.18.254.202
log-adjacency-changes detail
passive-interface default
|
|
|
|
Add new CLI command:
* "set protocols ospf redistribute table <n>"
|
|
|
|
FRR supports configuring either network prefixes per area, or assign an
interface to an area to participate in the routing process. This is already well
known from other venders and supported by FRR.
A valid VyOS OSPF configuration would then look like:
vyos@vyos# show protocols
ospf {
interface dum0 {
area 0
}
interface eth0.201 {
area 0
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
log-adjacency-changes {
detail
}
parameters {
abr-type cisco
router-id 172.18.254.201
}
passive-interface default
passive-interface-exclude eth0.201
}
|
|
|
