Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-11 | srv6: T5849: add segment support to "protocols static route6" | Christian Breunig | |
* set protocols static route6 <prefix> next-hop <address> segments 'x:x::x:x/y:y::y/z::z' * set protocols static route6 <prefix> interface <interface> segments 'x:x::x:x/y:y::y/z::z' | |||
2023-04-29 | static: T5161: add BFD monitoring for static routes | fett0 | |
2022-04-11 | T4353: enable linting of Jinja2 templates | Christian Poessinger | |
2022-04-03 | static: T4333: migrate to new vyos_defined Jinja2 test | Christian Poessinger | |
2022-03-03 | static: T4283: support "reject" routes - emit an ICMP unreachable when matched | Christian Poessinger | |
2022-02-07 | dhcp: T3600: Fix DHCP static table dhcp-interface route | Viacheslav Hletenko | |
Static table dhcp-interface route required table in template Without table this route will be placed to table 'main' by default | |||
2021-08-21 | route: static: T2450: add next-hop interface on dhcp routes | Christian Poessinger | |
2021-02-24 | route: static: T2450: add missing "dhcp-interface" route option | Christian Poessinger | |
As thought in the beginning the dhcp-interface route option can not be superseeded by the interface option. When a route is installed for a DHCP interface, that interface is usually a broadcast interface which can not be used for plain interface-based routes. The old Vyatta logic was migrated to Python where the current received next-hop address from the DHCP interface is installed as next-hop address. | |||
2021-02-14 | templates: convert DOS -> UNIX line endings | Christian Poessinger | |
2021-02-05 | route: static: T2450: provide full protocol support in XML and Python with ↵ | Christian Poessinger | |
new CLI |