| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Commit a8b2e52148d ("xml: Update routing-passive-interface-xml.i file extension
to standard .xml.i") only altered the RIP include statement but did not alter
the OSPF include.
|
|
Add new CLI command:
* "set protocols ospf redistribute table <n>"
|
|
|
|
FRR supports configuring either network prefixes per area, or assign an
interface to an area to participate in the routing process. This is already well
known from other venders and supported by FRR.
A valid VyOS OSPF configuration would then look like:
vyos@vyos# show protocols
ospf {
interface dum0 {
area 0
}
interface eth0.201 {
area 0
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
log-adjacency-changes {
detail
}
parameters {
abr-type cisco
router-id 172.18.254.201
}
passive-interface default
passive-interface-exclude eth0.201
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Capitalization fixes, more consice wording etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
When including XML files they all contained a comment from where the snipped
had actually been included from. The comment had been "included start" and
"included end" instead of "include start" and "include end".
This commit corrects the glitch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to fully re-use the XML based OSPF CLI definition for per-VRF routing,
the file structure needs to be reorganized and the common OSPF definition is
moved to its dedicated ospf-common-config.xml.i file, which can then be fully
re-included at the VRF level.
As the amount of include files now has reached a certain amount, this also
introduces "per topic" subdirectories on the filesystem to keep a clean
structure.
|
