| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to fully re-use the XML based OSPF CLI definition for per-VRF routing,
the file structure needs to be reorganized and the common OSPF definition is
moved to its dedicated ospf-common-config.xml.i file, which can then be fully
re-included at the VRF level.
As the amount of include files now has reached a certain amount, this also
introduces "per topic" subdirectories on the filesystem to keep a clean
structure.
|
|
|
|
This superseeds GitHub pull request #723 by implementing support to add an OSPF
virtual-link interface which connects different areas to the "no passive-interface"
configuration option when the system uses "passive-interface default".
Setting "protocols ospf passive-interface-exclude vlink0" on the VyOS CLI will
render the FRR OSPF configuration "no passive-interface VLINK0".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interface"
For easier maintenance and operability move the interface specific protocol
setting of OSPF to the OSPF protocol section. This is now also in-line with IS-IS.
This means to migrate:
ethernet eth0 {
vif 202 {
ip {
ospf {
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyosvyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
}
}
}
to
protocols {
ospf {
interface eth0.201 {
authentication {
md5 {
key-id 10 {
md5-key vyosvyos
}
}
}
dead-interval 40
hello-interval 10
priority 1
retransmit-interval 5
transmit-delay 1
}
}
|
|
This commit provides the implementation of the OSPF CLI with a Jinja2 template
that is loaded by FRR reload. It also contains some initial smoketests.
There is yet no verify() implementation!
|
|
|
|
|
