Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
* smoketest: T6747: call wait after commit() only for FRR related tests
Commit 702a60a8de28 ("smoketest: T6746: wait after commit() until frr-reload
is no longer running") added a guard timeout for every commit executed via CLI
smoketests. This commit changes the bahavior to only add the guard timeout
for FRR related testscases.
This improves the overall smoketest time.
* configd: T6747: use one long-lived instance of FRRender
Previously there was one FRRender() instance per config session. This resulted
in re-rendering the FRR configuration every time a new config session was
created.
Example:
vyos@vyos:~$ configure
vyos@vyos# set interfaces dummy dum0 description foo
vyos@vyos# commit
vyos@vyos# exit
vyos@vyos:~$ configure
vyos@vyos# set interfaces dummy dum0 description bar
vyos@vyos# commit
vyos@vyos# exit
In the past this caused a re-render of the FRR configuration as the delta check
added in commit ec80c75d6776 ("frrender: T6746: only re-render FRR config if
config_dict did change") evaluated to false, as it operated on a new instance
of the FRRender class.
With this change there is no FRR re-render, as there is nothing to update
in FRR.
|
|
The reason is that DHCP routes are not re-generated during FRRrender as long
as there is no protocols static entry in the configuration at all. Move out the
DHCP configuration read-in from the static section.
|
|
Migrate "set protocols static route <x.x.x.x/x> next-hop <y.y.y.y> bfd multi-hop
source <z.z.z.z> profile <NAME>" to: "set protocols static route <x.x.x.x/x>
next-hop <y.y.y.y> bfd profile bar"
FRR supports only one source IP address per BFD multi-hop session. VyOS
had CLI cupport for multiple source addresses which made no sense.
|
|
tagNode
This will save an entire level for the configuration and there is no need for a
parent "multicast" node, as it will only have "route" as tagNode below.
Move set protocols static multicast route <x.x.x.x/y> to:
* set protocols static mroute <x.x.x.x/y>
|
|
With FRR 10.0 daemons started to be migrated to integrated FRR mgmtd and a
northbound interface. This led to some drawbacks in the current state how
changes to FRR are handled. The current implementation will use frr-reload.py
and specifies excatly WHICH daemon needs a config update and will only replace
this part inside FRR.
With FRR10 and mgmtd when a partial configuration is sent to mgmtd, it will
remove configuration parts from other daemons like bgpd or ospfd which have
not yet been migrated to mgmtd.
It's not possible to call frr-reload.py with daemon mgmtd - it will error out.
This commit will also change the CLI for static routes:
CLI command "set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
source 1.1.1.1" will be split into:
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd source-address 1.1.1.1
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
To make the XML blocks reusable, and comply with the FRR CLI - this was actually
a wrong implementation from the beginning as you can not have multiple BFD
source addresses.
CLI command "set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
source 1.1.1.1 profile bar" is changed to:
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd profile bar
CLI commands "set protocols static multicast interface-route" is moved to:
* set protocols static multicast route <x.x.x.x/x> interface
To have an identical look and feel with regular static routes.
|
|
Commit 452068ce7 ("interfaces: T6592: moving an interface between VRF instances
failed") introduced a new helper to retrieve the VRF table ID from the Kernel.
This commit migrates the old code path where the individual fields got queried
to the new helper vyos.utils.network.get_vrf_tableid().
|
|
* set protocols static route6 <prefix> next-hop <address> segments 'x:x::x:x/y:y::y/z::z'
* set protocols static route6 <prefix> interface <interface> segments 'x:x::x:x/y:y::y/z::z'
|
|
* T5195: move run, cmd, call, rc_cmd helper to vyos.utils.process
* T5195: use read_file and write_file implementation from vyos.utils.file
Changed code automatically using:
find . -type f -not -path '*/\.*' -exec sed -i 's/^from vyos.util import read_file$/from vyos.utils.file import read_file/g' {} +
find . -type f -not -path '*/\.*' -exec sed -i 's/^from vyos.util import write_file$/from vyos.utils.file import write_file/g' {} +
* T5195: move chmod* helpers to vyos.utils.permission
* T5195: use colon_separated_to_dict from vyos.utils.dict
* T5195: move is_systemd_service_* to vyos.utils.process
* T5195: fix boot issues with missing imports
* T5195: move dict_search_* helpers to vyos.utils.dict
* T5195: move network helpers to vyos.utils.network
* T5195: move commit_* helpers to vyos.utils.commit
* T5195: move user I/O helpers to vyos.utils.io
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no need for protocol specific embedded smoketests as the route-map
option got removed. Tests are now conducted under the new CLI tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removing the Zebra/Linux Kernel route-map added by "set protocols static route-map"
was not removed once applied. This was because the removal must happen within
the zebra daemon and not staticd.
|
|
When we leak routes to a VRF it is verified that the target VRF actually
exists.
|
|
Currently every smoketest does the setup and destruction of the configsession
on its own durin setUp(). This creates a lot of overhead and one configsession
should be re-used during execution of every smoketest script.
In addiion a test that failed will leaf the system in an unconsistent state.
For this reason before the test is executed we will save the running config
to /tmp and the will re-load the config after the test has passed, always
ensuring a clean environment for the next test.
|
|
|
|
Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.
This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.
|
|
As we have upgrade to FRR 7.5 in current the issue within FRR vtysh [1]
is fixed.
[1]: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/8016
|
|
|
|
|