Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21 | Remove 2 interface requirement from dhcp-relay | Daniel Foster | |
More detail in Phabricator T1978. There is no requirement for dhcp-relay to have multiple interfaces configured. | |||
2019-02-08 | T1234: add missing option when processing dhcp-relay packets | Christian Poessinger | |
2018-11-02 | T939: Remove possibility to specify DHCP relay port | Christian Poessinger | |
2018-10-25 | T938: do not bind DHCP relay to default port if unspecified | Christian Poessinger | |
Binding isc-dhcp-relay to its default port (67 e.g. for IPv4) will result in an error when starting up the service: bad: ---- $ dhcrelay -q -4 -p 67 -c 10 -A 576 -m discard -i eth0.21 -i eth0 10.253.253.1 binding to user-specified port 67 good: ----- $ dhcrelay -q -4 -c 10 -A 576 -m discard -i eth0.21 -i eth0 10.253.253.1 Setting removed from the IPv6 implementation, too! | |||
2018-10-17 | T913: DHCP relay service XML/Python rewrite for IPv4 | Christian Poessinger | |