summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/migration-scripts/vrf/0-to-1
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-05-25configtest: T4382: missing block in migration script vrf/0-to-1John Estabrook
The config vrf-basic reveals a missing block in the migration script vrf/0-to-1, moving 'next-hop-vrf' to 'vrf'. As this only exists in Sagitta, modify script 0-to-1. Also, fix the 'system nt' typo seen in vrf-ospf.
2021-07-12vrf: route: static: T2450: we also need to migrate the interface based routesChristian Poessinger
Previously during migration if one had used interface routes, the VRF based ones got not migrated. The following "old" VyOS 1.3 configuration did not get migrated: set protocols static interface-route 10.20.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth2 next-hop-vrf 'blue' set protocols static interface-route 10.30.0.0/24 next-hop-interface br10 next-hop-vrf 'red' set protocols vrf blue static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default' set protocols vrf red static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default' set vrf name blue table '3000' set vrf name mgmt table '1000' set vrf name red table '2000' It must get migrated to: set protocols static route 10.20.0.0/24 interface eth2 vrf 'blue' set protocols static route 10.30.0.0/24 interface br10 vrf 'red' set vrf name blue protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default' set vrf name blue table '3000' set vrf name mgmt table '1000' set vrf name red protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default' set vrf name red table '2000'
2021-02-05vrf: T2450: provide full protocol support in XML and Python with new CLIChristian Poessinger