vyos-1x.git - VyOS command definitions, scripts, and utilities (mirror of https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x.git)

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2021-07-12	vrf: route: static: T2450: we also need to migrate the interface based routes	Christian Poessinger
	Previously during migration if one had used interface routes, the VRF based ones got not migrated. The following "old" VyOS 1.3 configuration did not get migrated: set protocols static interface-route 10.20.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth2 next-hop-vrf 'blue' set protocols static interface-route 10.30.0.0/24 next-hop-interface br10 next-hop-vrf 'red' set protocols vrf blue static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default' set protocols vrf red static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default' set vrf name blue table '3000' set vrf name mgmt table '1000' set vrf name red table '2000' It must get migrated to: set protocols static route 10.20.0.0/24 interface eth2 vrf 'blue' set protocols static route 10.30.0.0/24 interface br10 vrf 'red' set vrf name blue protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default' set vrf name blue table '3000' set vrf name mgmt table '1000' set vrf name red protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default' set vrf name red table '2000'
2021-03-14	vrf: T3344: move dynamic routing protocols under "vrf name <name> protocols"	Christian Poessinger
	Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf\|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf\|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts are placed under the same root node. This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.