From 548d9057e3ed66852bb2be62fe770c265712b4f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Poessinger <christian@poessinger.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:08:38 +0100
Subject: vrf: T3344: move dynamic routing protocols under "vrf name <name>
 protocols"

Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.

This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.
---
 data/configd-include.json | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'data/configd-include.json')

diff --git a/data/configd-include.json b/data/configd-include.json
index aabd7232e..eed858363 100644
--- a/data/configd-include.json
+++ b/data/configd-include.json
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
 "protocols_ripng.py",
 "protocols_static.py",
 "protocols_static_multicast.py",
-"protocols_vrf.py",
 "salt-minion.py",
 "service_console-server.py",
 "service_ids_fastnetmon.py",
-- 
cgit v1.2.3