From 548d9057e3ed66852bb2be62fe770c265712b4f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Poessinger Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:08:38 +0100 Subject: vrf: T3344: move dynamic routing protocols under "vrf name protocols" Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under the "protocols vrf [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under the "vrf name protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts are placed under the same root node. This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node. --- interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in | 58 ------------------------------ 1 file changed, 58 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in (limited to 'interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in') diff --git a/interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in b/interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in deleted file mode 100644 index e40edb16c..000000000 --- a/interface-definitions/protocols-vrf.xml.in +++ /dev/null @@ -1,58 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - Name of VRF to add route for - - vrf name - - - txt - VRF instance name - - - - - VRF instance name must be 15 characters or less and can not\nbe named as regular network interfaces.\n - - - - - Static route parameters - - - #include - #include - - - - - Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) - - u32:1-4294967294 - Autonomous System Number - - - - - - - #include - - - - - Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) - - - #include - - - #include - - - - - -- cgit v1.2.3