From bafc84f32635dd00850a334b7802e6afa28e2b0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Poessinger Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:51:49 +0200 Subject: policy: T3490: lower priority to keep up with Policy-Based-Routing (PBR) PBR is implemented in vyatta-cfg-firewall and the new policy framework uses one script to rule them all that is triggered from the main policy level. As the PBR configuration is a subnode with a lower priority we get an inversion, thus all policy based configuration which applies to FRR only, is set to priority 200. Automated tests did not show any regression. --- interface-definitions/policy.xml.in | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'interface-definitions') diff --git a/interface-definitions/policy.xml.in b/interface-definitions/policy.xml.in index cd22052f0..08e2ce2c6 100644 --- a/interface-definitions/policy.xml.in +++ b/interface-definitions/policy.xml.in @@ -2,14 +2,13 @@ - 470 + 200 Routing policy IP access-list filter - u32:1-99 IP standard access list @@ -238,7 +237,6 @@ Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) extended community-list filter - 490 txt Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) extended community-list filter -- cgit v1.2.3