From 927c98f23a6317e2e3565032023d68b753d71037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Poessinger Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:28:46 +0200 Subject: pppoe: T2248: connect-on-demand and vrf are mutually exclusive As PPP can be used to establish a connection on-demand it manages the Kernel default route. This can not be used when using VRFs which are managed by the ip-up.d and ip-down.d scripts - thus those options are now mutially exclusive. The best fix would be adding support for VRFs into PPP. --- src/conf_mode/interfaces-pppoe.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/conf_mode/interfaces-pppoe.py b/src/conf_mode/interfaces-pppoe.py index 5f073dac6..353a5a12c 100755 --- a/src/conf_mode/interfaces-pppoe.py +++ b/src/conf_mode/interfaces-pppoe.py @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ def verify(pppoe): if vrf_name and vrf_name not in interfaces(): raise ConfigError(f'VRF {vrf_name} does not exist') + if pppoe['on_demand'] and pppoe['vrf']: + raise ConfigError('On-demand dialing and VRF can not be used at the same time') + return None def generate(pppoe): -- cgit v1.2.3