From d80c8552b60d499dbec7fb37e09ab8fc4145ce2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:04:22 +0200 Subject: Adding live-package 0.99.6-1. --- templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html (limited to 'templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html') diff --git a/templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html b/templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0d5b7d4c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/templates/common/doc/FAQ/html/footnotes.en.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + + + + + + +The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ - Footnotes + + + + + +
+ +

+The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ +
Footnotes

+ +

1

+ +

+When the present-day sid did not exist, the FTP site organization had one major +flaw: there was an assumption that when an architecture is created in the +current unstable, it will be released when that distribution becomes the new +stable. For many architectures that isn't the case, with the result that those +directories had to be moved at release time. This was impractical because the +move would chew up lots of bandwidth. +

+ +

+The archive administrators worked around this problem for several years by +placing binaries for unreleased architectures in a special directory called +"sid". For those architectures not yet released, the first time they +were released there was a link from the current stable to sid, and from then on +they were created inside the unstable tree as normal. This layout was somewhat +confusing to users. +

+ +

+With the advent of package pools (see What's in the +pool directory?, Section 5.10), binary packages began to be +stored in a canonical location in the pool, regardless of the distribution, so +releasing a distribution no longer causes large bandwidth consumption on the +mirrors (there is, however, a lot of gradual bandwidth consumption throughout +the development process). +

+ +

2

+ +

+dists/stable/main, dists/stable/contrib, +dists/stable/non-free, and dists/unstable/main/, etc. +

+ +

3

+ +

+Historically, packages were kept in the subdirectory of dists +corresponding to which distribution contained them. This turned out to cause +various problems, such as large bandwidth consumption on mirrors when major +changes were made. This was fixed with the introduction of the package pool. +

+ +

+The dists directories are still used for the index files used by +programs like apt. You may also still see paths containing +dists/potato or dists/woody in the Filename header +field of some older packages. +

+ +

4

+ +

+Notice that there are ports that make this tool available with other package +management systems, like Red Hat package manager, also known as +rpm +

+ +

5

+ +

+Although this can also lead to systems with more packages installed than they +actually need to work. +

+ +

6

+ +

+Use the debian-list-subject-REQUEST@lists.debian.org address for +that. +

+ +
+ +

+The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ +

+ +
+version 3.1.3, 25 April 2006
+
+Authors are listed at Debian FAQ Authors
+
+
+
+ + + + + -- cgit v1.2.3