| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrate "set protocols static route <x.x.x.x/x> next-hop <y.y.y.y> bfd multi-hop
source <z.z.z.z> profile <NAME>" to: "set protocols static route <x.x.x.x/x>
next-hop <y.y.y.y> bfd profile bar"
FRR supports only one source IP address per BFD multi-hop session. VyOS
had CLI cupport for multiple source addresses which made no sense.
|
|
tagNode
This will save an entire level for the configuration and there is no need for a
parent "multicast" node, as it will only have "route" as tagNode below.
Move set protocols static multicast route <x.x.x.x/y> to:
* set protocols static mroute <x.x.x.x/y>
|
|
With FRR 10.0 daemons started to be migrated to integrated FRR mgmtd and a
northbound interface. This led to some drawbacks in the current state how
changes to FRR are handled. The current implementation will use frr-reload.py
and specifies excatly WHICH daemon needs a config update and will only replace
this part inside FRR.
With FRR10 and mgmtd when a partial configuration is sent to mgmtd, it will
remove configuration parts from other daemons like bgpd or ospfd which have
not yet been migrated to mgmtd.
It's not possible to call frr-reload.py with daemon mgmtd - it will error out.
This commit will also change the CLI for static routes:
CLI command "set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
source 1.1.1.1" will be split into:
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd source-address 1.1.1.1
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
To make the XML blocks reusable, and comply with the FRR CLI - this was actually
a wrong implementation from the beginning as you can not have multiple BFD
source addresses.
CLI command "set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd multi-hop
source 1.1.1.1 profile bar" is changed to:
* set protocols static route 10.0.0.0/8 next-hop 1.2.3.4 bfd profile bar
CLI commands "set protocols static multicast interface-route" is moved to:
* set protocols static multicast route <x.x.x.x/x> interface
To have an identical look and feel with regular static routes.
|
|
Drop newlines added by macro statement and Jinja2 comments. Jinja2 comments
will be removed during package build on the shipped files.
|
|
|
|
Commit a2ab95ff68b ("pppoe: T4384: replace default-route CLI option with common
CLI nodes already present for DHCP") had an issue as the PPPoE interface options
and also DHCP interface options did not honor the no-default-route option.
This has been fixed.
|
|
present for DHCP
VyOS 1.4 still leverages PPPd internals on the CLI.
pppd supports three options for a default route, none, auto, force.
* none: No default route is installed on interface up
* auto: Default route is only installed if there is yet no default route
* force: overwrite any default route
There are several drawbacks in this design for VyOS and the users. If auto is
specified, this only counted for static default routes - but what about dynamic
ones? Same for force, only a static default route got replaced but dynamic ones
did not got taken into account.
The CLI is changed and we now re-use already existing nodes from the DHCP
interface configuration:
* no-default-route:
On link up no default route is installed, same as the previous
default-route none
* default-route-distance:
We can now specify the distance of this route for the routing table on the
system. This defaults to 210 as we have for DHCP interfaces. All this will be
migrated using a CLI migration script.
|
|
static routes
Issue is identical to the problem in T3680 (05aa22dcb4ce) which was for DHCP
based routes. Once a static route is added to the system, the PPPoE
auto-installed default route is lost.
|
|
|
