| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The legal team says years are not necessary so we can go ahead with it, since
it will simplify backporting.
Automatically removed using: git ls-files | grep -v libvyosconfig | xargs sed -i -E \
's/^# Copyright (19|20)[0-9]{2}(-[0-9]{4})? VyOS maintainers.*/# Copyright VyOS maintainers and contributors <maintainers@vyos.io>/g'
In addition we will error-out during "make" if someone re-adds a legacy
copyright notice
|
|
The migration script assumed the existence of path
['vrf', 'name', tag-val-name, 'protocols', 'static', 'route']
ignoring sole entries for [..., 'route6'].
Check existence of each path before calling set_tag.
|
|
|
|
The script's name is always provided as the first argument sys.argv[0]
Expected length for argv is 2 (script itself + config file)
Change: 'if (len(argv) < 1)' to 'if len(argv) < 2'
|
|
Previously during migration if one had used interface routes, the VRF based
ones got not migrated.
The following "old" VyOS 1.3 configuration did not get migrated:
set protocols static interface-route 10.20.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth2 next-hop-vrf 'blue'
set protocols static interface-route 10.30.0.0/24 next-hop-interface br10 next-hop-vrf 'red'
set protocols vrf blue static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default'
set protocols vrf red static interface-route 10.0.0.0/24 next-hop-interface eth1 next-hop-vrf 'default'
set vrf name blue table '3000'
set vrf name mgmt table '1000'
set vrf name red table '2000'
It must get migrated to:
set protocols static route 10.20.0.0/24 interface eth2 vrf 'blue'
set protocols static route 10.30.0.0/24 interface br10 vrf 'red'
set vrf name blue protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default'
set vrf name blue table '3000'
set vrf name mgmt table '1000'
set vrf name red protocols static route 10.0.0.0/24 interface eth1 vrf 'default'
set vrf name red table '2000'
|
|
Instead of having the dynamic routing protocols OSPF and BGP residing under
the "protocols vrf <name> [ospf|bgp]" nodes, rather move them directly under
the "vrf name <name> protocols [ospf|bgp]" node. Now all VRF related parts
are placed under the same root node.
This eases the verify steps tremendously, as we do not need to check wheter a
VRF eists or not, it will always exist as we operate under a child node.
|
